Home Site Menu Religion Menu Interesting Menu Humour Menu Guestbook Forum Email

Back To What's So Special About Jesus?

The Births Of The Messiah

The oldest of the gospels, the Gospel of Mark, tells us almost nothing of the ancestry, birth, or childhood of Jesus. We learn nothing of Joseph the carpenter, supposed father of the alleged Messiah, and it only mentions that Jesus' mother was named Mary

Mark 6:3 Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.

The latest gospel,that of John, has very sparse details about the human side of Jesus, although he does mention that Jesus had a father named Joseph and an un-named mother, as well as brothers.

Only in the canonical gospels of Matthew and Luke is there to be found any mention of the genealogy Jesus. For some reason, however, the genealogies don't match...

Typical Apologetics Reasons For Inconsistencies In The Genealogies
In any given society, genealogies may function in more than one of the three spheres...it would be possible for a society to have a number of apparently conflicting genealogies, each of which could be considered accurate in terms of its function.

Luke's goes all the way back to Adam and has 56 generations. His interest is in establishing a tone of universality in the Gospel message and mission, as he does in Acts with the admission of Gentiles into the Kingdom of God. This is all there is to his purpose, and so the genealogy is linear rather than segmented.

Matthew's goes back to Abraham and has 3 groups of 14 generations. Here he certainly telescopes, as noted above (and Luke probably does, too). But Matthew is trying to prove certain points with his genealogy that Luke is not.

Second, Matthew has split into blocks of 14 so as to match the Hebrew sum for the numerical equivalent to the name David. Finally, Matthew wants to include some women of a questionable character, because they serve as an "in your face" to the expected charge that Jesus' birth was in some way scandalous or abnormal.
There is no discrepancy because one genealogy is for Mary and the other is for Joseph. It was customary to mention the genealogy through the father even though it was clearly known that it was through Mary.

Interestingly, unless you're a Christian,:

according to Jeremiah 22:28-30, no descendent in Solomon's line could be king. Jesus avoided this curse by getting the legal right to the throne from Joseph, who was not a blood relative, and the blood right as son of David from Mary. Although this odd, convoluted explaination seems to satisfiy Christian Apologetics this fascinating solution is never mentioned in the scriptures.

22:28 Is this man Coniah a despised broken idol? is he a vessel wherein is no pleasure? wherefore are they cast out, he and his seed, and are cast into a land which they know not?
22:29
O earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the LORD.
22:30
Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.

There was really no need for a genealogy or detailed biography of Jesus when the Book of Mark was written as it was expected that the end of the world was near and Jesus would return, trailing clouds of glory, within a generation. There was only a need for his followers to take heed the warnings,

Mark 13:33 Take ye heed, watch and pray: for ye know not when the time is.

13:34 For the Son of Man is as a man taking a far journey, who left his house, and gave authority to his servants, and to every man his work, and commanded the porter to watch.
13:35
Watch ye therefore: for ye know not when the master of the house cometh, at even, or at midnight, or at the cockcrowing, or in the morning:

13:36 Lest coming suddenly he find you sleeping.

13:37 And what I say unto you I say unto all, Watch.

By the time the authors of Matthew and Luke wrote their own gospels, not first-hand accounts but heavily plagiarized from Mark, including the passage predicting that the world would soon end

Matthew 24:34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.

24:35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.

it had become abundantly clear that the world was carrying on as usual and had definitely not ended, and that Christians would be in for a very long wait.

So, something was required to keep the faithful happy while they were waiting for his delayed return and to stop his followers from drifting away. After all, why believe in someone who can't even fulfill his own prophecy? Membership must have been dwindling so something had to be found to act as a good selling point for the faith.

Picture the scene ~ a conversation between two priests, Hezron and Matthat:

"We've got to face facts, we backed the wrong one. He's not coming back, is he?"

"No he's not. I always thought that one was unreliable, what with cursing a fig tree and encouring his friends to steal a horse. What are we going to do now, pack this in and get proper jobs?"

"WHAT! You must be joking! Listen Matthat, my grandad didn't do all that work on Leviticus, making sure that the priests got the pick of the crop and the best of everything, for us to throw it all away just because its not true . This is the plan: we'll declare him to be "the messiah", "the anointed one", "the Christ" or whatever, that everyone has been waiting for.

You have a word with Matthew. He's got a copy of Marks' book. Tell him to add in a genealogy "proving" that Jesus is related to that randy David. He's a good lad with plenty of imagination. I'll do the same with Luke."

"What a great idea, Hezron! It won't even matter if they don't match. There'll always be someone who'll believe what we tell them, dispite the contradictions and inconsistencies."

"Now you're catching on, Matthat! That should keep them happy for a while. After that we'll start crediting Jesus with being a god. Why should the pagans have all the good myths? Give him a virgin birth, a few miracles, a crucifixion and resurrection, maybe even a fulfilled prophecy."

Some Of The Many Virgin Births Preceeding Jesus

Ra Apis Jove
Jason Horus Osiris
Hercules Dionysos Amenkemp

So a virgin-birth story was made up for Jesus.

One problem with the virgin birth of Jesus is that it negated the genealogies which had previously been invented. If Jesus had been born of a virgin, since both of the genealogies in the New Testament are genealogies of Joseph, it follows that the genealogies could no longer prove the descent of Jesus through the line of David, if Jesus was not the son of Joseph.

Many Christians don't seem to care that the Josephan genealogies are wholly irrelevant if Jesus is not the biological son of Joseph. They leave it to the heretics to notice and for the Apologists to prevaricate.

Chart showing the inconsistancies in the geneolgies of Jesus

The genealogies of Jesus in Matthew and Luke

MATTHEW 1:1-16 LUKE 3:23-31
1. Jesus
2. Joseph
3. Jacob
4. Matthan
5. Eleazar
6. Eluid
7. Achim
8. Zadok
9. Azor
10. Eliakim
11. Abiud
12. Zerubbabel
13.Shealtiel
14. Jechoniah
15. Josiah
16. Amon
17. Manasseh
18. Hezekiah
19. Ahaz
20. Jotham
21. Uzziah
22. Joram
23. Jehoshapat
24. Asa
25. Abijah
26. Rehoboam
27. Solomon
28. David
29. Jesse
30. Obed
31. Boaz
32. Salmon
33. Nahshon
34. Amminadab
35. Ram
36. Hezron
37. Perez
38. Judah
39. Jacob
40. Isaac
41. Abraham
1. Jesus
2. Joseph
3. Heli
4. Matthat
5. Levi
6. Melchi
7. Jannai
8. Joseph
9. Mattathias
10. Amos
11. Nahum
12. Esli
13. Naggai
14. Maath
15. Mattathias
16. Semein
17. Josech
18. Joda
19. Joanan
20. Rhesa
21. Zerubbabel
22. Shealtiel
23. Neri
24. Melchi
25. Addi
26. Cosam
27. Elmadam
28. Er
29. Joshua
30. Eliezer
31. Jorim
32. Matthat
33. Levi
34. Simeon
35. Judah
36. Joseph
37. Joanm
38. Eliakim
39. Melea
40. Menna
41. Mattatha
42. Nathan
43. David

Why does the genealogy in Matthew 1 show that Jesus descended through a cursed line? Jeconiah/Jehoiachin and his father Jehoiakim were both cursed by God himself, who said that neither of these men would have any descendent on the throne of David.

How could Jesus possibly be the Messiah, destined to rule forever on the throne of David, if he descended through either of these acursed men?

A Point To Ponder

The importance of the verses below is usually missed by Christians but the meaning is clear.

His family, including his mother Mary, upon hearing that Jesus had started preaching thought he had gone mad and went to take charge of him. Jesus, angered or perhaps embarrassed by his family's reaction, publicly denounced them.

Mark 3:21 And when his friends heard of it, they went out to lay hold on him: for they said, He is beside himself.

3:31 There came then his brethren and his mother, and, standing without, sent unto him, calling him.

3:32 And the multitude sat about him, and they said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren without seek for thee.
3:33
And he answered them, saying, Who is my mother, or my brethren?

3:34 And he looked round about on them which sat about him, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!

You would think that his own family, especially his mother, would appreciate the importance of the Nativity and its meaning. You would think that instead of trying to stop him, the would actively encourage him.

A couple of questions spring to mind upon reading the verses:

  • why did Mary try to stop him when he started to preach?
  • Didn't she know that she had given birth to "the Son of God"?
  • Did she really consent to be the virgin mother of the "son of the most high"?
  • Wasn't it she who sang the Magnificat and said that "all generations will call me blessed" because she will be the mother of Jesus?
  • Why was she, and the rest of the family surprized when Jesus started preaching?
  • Did the historical Mary, who had at least seven children, know nothing of the angels, the virgin birth, the slaughter of the innocents, the visit of the wise men and the star of Bethlehem because these events never happened?

The correct date of Jesus' birth raises even more uncertainties:

  • The gospels show at least four separate years of birth.
  • If Jesus was born during the reign of Herod the Great then it must before or around 4 BCE.
  • If he was born during the Roman census, then it must have been in 6 CE.
  • Luke 3:23 states that Jesus was about thirty years old when he began to preach and that was during the "fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberias Caesar" ~ Luke 3:1. Augustus Caesar died in 14 CE and Tiberias was his successor, and the fifteenth year of his reign would be around 29 or 30 CE. This sets the birth of Jesus to around 1 BCE or 1 CE.
  • In John a passage implies that Jesus was nearly fifty years old during the time of his ministry
    John 8:57 "You are not yet fifty years old" the Jews said to Jesus "and you have seen Abraham.
    so it seems likely that John meant this verse to show that Jesus was in his late forties. This will bring the date of Jesus' birth to slightly after 20 BCE.

So, four different birthdates of Jesus:

  • John ~ circa 20 BCE
  • Luke ~ circa 6 CE
  • Matthew and Luke circa 4 BCE
  • Luke circa 1 BCE to 1 CE

If the bible is inerrant or inspired by God, why a discrepancy of more than a quarter of a century?

Jesus was not born on December 25th. Neither Luke nor Matthew gave any indication of Jesus' actual birthday. Like many things Christian, the origin of this date comes from the celebration of the pagan religions which nascent Christianity had to compete against. Here too, wee see Christianity assimilating portions of paganisms into its structure.

December 25th was the date of the winter solstice After this, the winter, having reached its peak, slowly gives way to spring. The winter solstice therefore, had been traditionally in Roman times, a period of unrestrained celebration. The celebration was called the Dies Natalis Solis Invicti or "the birthday of the unconquered sun." In the pagan religion of Mithraism, which was a form of sun-worship, the winter solstice was naturally an occasion of great celebration. The worship of Sol Invictus, the Sun God, became so popular that by AD274, the Roman Emperor Aurelian (c212-275) gave official sanction to December 25th as the birthday of that God.

Christianity in it battle with the pagan religions for converts slowly assimilated their celebrations and beliefs. Christmas day became one of the assimilated celebrations. By the year 354 we already have documents referring to December 25th as the birthday of Jesus. By 440 Christians were celebrating the winter solstice as the birthday of Jesus. By the sixth century, during the reign of Emperor Justinian (527-565), it had become recognized as an official Christian holiday.

In early on Christianity there were fierce debates about whether December 25th of January 6th should be celebrated as the birthday of Jesus. Why January 6th? January 6th was celebrated in ancient Alexandria as -you guessed it! - the birthday of Osiris-Dionysius. The Armenian church still celebrates January 6th as Christmas to this day.

Thus one of the most important dates in the Christian calender, like so many portions of the Jesus story, is an assimilated pagan celebration.

Christmas and the Star of Bethlehem

There is no historical evidence that Christ was born on December 25th. December 25th was officially adopted by Bishop Liberius of Rome in 354. December 25th occurs during the rainy season in the Holy Land, so it is highly unlikely that shepherds would be outside in their pastures "watching their flock by night".

The Hayden Planetarium in New York recreated the heavens as they were in the time that Christ was allegedly born. Although nothing spectacular happened in the skies on the date of Christ's birth, the Planetarium went back to the year 6 BCE.

On that date, there were three stars in close proximity which created a spectacularly bright beacon, which may account for the stories of the Star of Bethlehem. The most plausible reason that December 25 was chosen as a day to celebrate Christ's birth was that the Christian fathers were trying to compete with another religion, Mithraism the sun god whose holy day was also December 25th.

Chart By Eric B. Ptak

Site Menu | Home | Guestbook | Religion Menu | You, A Real Christian? | Christian Cliches | Christian Family Values | God's Golden Hemhorroids | Forum | Email